TL;DR
Get hardware and tech essentials delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
The Riga City Court sentenced Polina Kamleva, a resident of Rēzekne, to six years in prison for financing an armed conflict. Investigators said a 43-euro transfer was intended to help buy a drone-jamming system for Russian forces; Kamleva denied having that intent, and prosecutors had sought an eight-year sentence.
The Riga City Court sentenced Polina Kamleva, a resident of Rēzekne, to six years in prison for financing an armed conflict, Latvian outlet Delfi reported. Investigators said a 43-euro transfer was intended to help buy a drone-jamming device for Russian forces. Kamleva told the court she had not meant to finance the Russian army and disputed that the messages cited by investigators established such intent.
According to Delfi’s account of the case, the transfer was made in December 2024, after an acquaintance associated with Russia’s Kaskad military-patriotic center asked Kamleva to help raise money for a mobile electronic warfare system. Investigators said Kamleva then contacted an acquaintance living in Belarus and asked him to send the money on her behalf because transfers from Latvian banks to Russian banks were not possible.
The acquaintance sent 157 Belarusian rubles from his personal account, an amount reported as equivalent to about 43 euros. Investigators said the intended purchase was equipment to disrupt drones and that the system was meant for Russian forces. The available report does not say whether the device was ultimately bought or delivered.
Latvia’s State Security Service detained Kamleva in December 2025. Delfi reported at the time that she was a member of the Latvian Russian Union Party and described her as a pro-Russian activist. Prosecutors sought an eight-year prison term; the court imposed six years. Latvia’s criminal code provides for a maximum sentence of 10 years for financing an armed conflict, according to the report.
A Small Transfer, Serious Charge
The case shows how Latvian authorities applied the offense of financing an armed conflict to a small cross-border payment that investigators said was connected to military equipment for Russia. The court’s six-year sentence is shorter than the eight years prosecutors requested, but the reported maximum of 10 years signals the potential severity of the charge under Latvian law.
The ruling also turns on a question that Kamleva directly contested: whether her actions amounted to criminal intent to support Russian forces. The reported facts describe investigators’ account and her response, but do not provide the court’s full reasoning. The sentence is relevant to readers because it concerns how wartime support, indirect transfers, and intent are treated in a country bordering Russia.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How Investigators Traced the Payment
The sequence described by investigators began with a WhatsApp exchange in December 2024. Delfi reported that Kamleva agreed to help raise funds for military equipment for the Russian army after being asked by an acquaintance from the Kaskad military-patriotic center. Investigators said the request involved a mobile electronic warfare system, which they described as intended to jam drones.
Because, according to investigators, a transfer from Latvia to a Russian bank was not possible, they said Kamleva asked a contact in Belarus to make the payment. That contact sent 157 Belarusian rubles from his own account. The State Security Service detained Kamleva about a year later, in December 2025. The report identifies the case as a prosecution for financing an armed conflict, rather than a sentence for personally supplying or operating military equipment.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Intent and Equipment Destination
The report does not include the court’s full judgment or explain in detail how judges assessed the evidence of Kamleva’s intent. It also does not establish whether the electronic warfare system was purchased, where it was sent, or whether Russian forces received it. Those points should not be treated as confirmed outcomes of the transfer.
Kamleva said messages found on her phone did not clearly show that the money was meant for Russian forces. She also told the court she was unemployed and in serious psychological distress when she was asked to help, and said she felt unable to refuse. The available account does not say whether she plans to appeal, whether the sentence is final, or whether any appeal deadline or hearing has been set.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Appeal Status and Court Ruling
The next key development would be confirmation of whether Kamleva appeals the six-year sentence and whether a higher court reviews it. The report available so far does not provide an appeal decision, a filing deadline, or the detailed written reasoning behind the Riga City Court’s judgment.
Further reporting could clarify how the court treated the WhatsApp messages and the Belarus-based transfer, as well as whether it found evidence that the equipment was actually acquired or delivered. Until those details are available, the confirmed account remains that the court convicted Kamleva over the transfer, while she denied the specific intent alleged by investigators.
military drone disruption equipment
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Who was sentenced by the Latvian court?
Polina Kamleva, a resident of Rēzekne, was sentenced by the Riga City Court to six years in prison for financing an armed conflict, according to Delfi.
What was the 43-euro transfer allegedly for?
Investigators said the money was meant to help buy a drone-jamming device for Russian forces. The report does not confirm that the device was bought or delivered.
What did Kamleva say in court?
Kamleva denied intending to finance the Russian army. She said the messages did not clearly establish that purpose and asked the court to distinguish between doing something wrong and having criminal intent.
How long had prosecutors sought to imprison her?
Prosecutors sought an eight-year sentence. The court imposed six years. The reported maximum penalty for financing an armed conflict under Latvia’s criminal code is 10 years.
Is it known whether Kamleva will appeal?
No appeal information was included in the available report. It is also unclear whether the sentence is final or whether a higher court will review the case.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
